Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and you may Individual Conclusion, 29(2), 119�126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area of connection from inside the person mating. Review of Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186�204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Web sites paradox revisited. Journal from Social Things, 58(1), 49�74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technical you to decreases social involvement and you may mental well-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.

The many benefits of positive illusions: Idealization additionally the structure of satisfaction when you look at the romantic matchmaking

Kreider, R.Yards., & Industries, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, time, and lifetime of marriage ceremonies and you will divorces. Current Inhabitants Account, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study out of intimacy, hobbies, and you may union: Comparison the presumptions of triangular concept from like. Psychological Account, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Impact best regarding carrying out even worse: Public evaluations contained in this personal matchmaking. Journal away from Personality and you can Personal Psychology, 87(1), 80�95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Log out-of Identity and you can Social Psychology, 97(1), 74�87.

Intrasexual vigilance: The implicit cognition regarding personal competition

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention to attractive choices: The fresh new progressed therapy off relationships repair. Advancement and you can Peoples Conclusion, 29(5), 343�349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential studies out-of argument and you will agreement for the disappointed and nondistressed relationship lovers. Record from Contacting and you will Logical Therapy, 49(4), 554�567.

McKenna, K. Y. A good., Environmentally friendly, A good. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Dating formation online: What is the large destination? Log out of Personal Items, 58(1), 9�31.

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-research objectives from inside the intimate relationship: A model of international enhancement and you will specific confirmation. For the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents from the study of pair telecommunications (pp. 32�58). Ny, NY: Cambridge University Drive.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the consumer-counselor thread from the lens regarding connection theory. Psychotherapy: Concept, Look, Routine, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The newest public keeping track of program: Increased sensitiveness in order to public signs as the an adaptive a reaction to public exemption. During the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh public outcast: Ostracism, societal different, rejection, and intimidation (pp. 213�226). Nyc, NY: Therapy Push.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Globally and you will specific relational habits on the exposure to societal relationships. Log regarding Personality and you will Societal Psychology, 80(4), 613�631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you may information looking to during the close relationship. Identity and you may Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may certain accessory representations in adulthood: Is there a romance?. Diary Out of Public And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Good. (2001)mitment and relationships repairs mechanisms. In the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), best classic dating apps Close personal relationship: Fix and enhancement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection myself feeling among partners just like the a purpose of the resemblance within shared event. Identity And you can Public Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience out of extrinsic perks into preference and you may loving. Record from Personality and you can Social Mindset, 38(3), 453�460.